NAME


mro - Method Resolution Order

SYNOPSIS



  use mro; # enables next::method and friends globally

  use mro dfs; # enable DFS MRO for this class (Perl default)
  use mro c3; # enable C3 MRO for this class

DESCRIPTION


The mro namespace provides several utilities for dealing with method resolution order and method caching in general.

These interfaces are only available in Perl 5.9.5 and higher. See MRO::Compat on CPAN for a mostly forwards compatible implementation for older Perls.

OVERVIEW


It’s possible to change the MRO of a given class either by using

use
mro
as shown in the synopsis, or by using the mro::set_mro function below. The functions in the mro namespace do not require loading the
mro
module, as they are actually provided by the core perl interpreter.

The special methods

next::method
,
next::can
, and
maybe::next::method
are not available until this
mro
module has been loaded via
use
or
require
.

The C3 MRO


In addition to the traditional Perl default MRO (depth first search, called

DFS
here), Perl now offers the C3 MRO as well. Perl’s support for C3 is based on the work done in Stevan Little’s module Class::C3, and most of the C3-related documentation here is ripped directly from there.

What is C3?


C3 is the name of an algorithm which aims to provide a sane method resolution order under multiple inheritance. It was first introduced in the language Dylan (see links in the SEE ALSO section), and then later adopted as the preferred MRO (Method Resolution Order) for the new-style classes in Python 2.3. Most recently it has been adopted as the canonical MRO for Perl 6 classes, and the default MRO for Parrot objects as well.

How does C3 work


C3 works by always preserving local precendence ordering. This essentially means that no class will appear before any of its subclasses. Take, for instance, the classic diamond inheritance pattern:


     <A>
    /   \
  <B>   <C>
    \   /
     <D>

The standard Perl 5 MRO would be (D, B, A, C). The result being that A appears before C, even though C is the subclass of A. The C3 MRO algorithm however, produces the following order: (D, B, C, A), which does not have this issue.

This example is fairly trivial; for more complex cases and a deeper explanation, see the links in the SEE ALSO section.

Functions


mro::get_linear_isa($classname[, \f(CW$type\fP])


Returns an arrayref which is the linearized MRO of the given class. Uses whichever MRO is currently in effect for that class by default, or the given MRO (either

c3
or
dfs
if specified as
$type
).

The linearized MRO of a class is an ordered array of all of the classes one would search when resolving a method on that class, starting with the class itself.

If the requested class doesn’t yet exist, this function will still succeed, and return

[ $classname ]

Note that

UNIVERSAL
(and any members of
UNIVERSAL
’s MRO) are not part of the MRO of a class, even though all classes implicitly inherit methods from
UNIVERSAL
and its parents.

mro::set_mro($classname, \f(CW$type\fP)


Sets the MRO of the given class to the

$type
argument (either
c3
or
dfs
).

mro::get_mro($classname)


Returns the MRO of the given class (either

c3
or
dfs
).

mro::get_isarev($classname)


Gets the

mro_isarev
for this class, returned as an arrayref of class names. These are every class that isa the given class name, even if the isa relationship is indirect. This is used internally by the MRO code to keep track of method/MRO cache invalidations.

Currently, this list only grows, it never shrinks. This was a performance consideration (properly tracking and deleting isarev entries when someone removes an entry from an

@ISA
is costly, and it doesn’t happen often anyways). The fact that a class which no longer truly isa this class at runtime remains on the list should be considered a quirky implementation detail which is subject to future change. It shouldn’t be an issue as long as you’re looking at this list for the same reasons the core code does: as a performance optimization over having to search every class in existence.

As with

mro::get_mro
above,
UNIVERSAL
is special.
UNIVERSAL
(and parents’) isarev lists do not include every class in existence, even though all classes are effectively descendants for method inheritance purposes.

mro::is_universal($classname)


Returns a boolean status indicating whether or not the given classname is either

UNIVERSAL
itself, or one of
UNIVERSAL
’s parents by
@ISA
inheritance.

Any class for which this function returns true is universal in the sense that all classes potentially inherit methods from it.

For similar reasons to

isarev
above, this flag is permanent. Once it is set, it does not go away, even if the class in question really isn’t universal anymore.

\fImro::invalidate_all_method_caches()\fP


Increments

PL_sub_generation
, which invalidates method caching in all packages.

mro::method_changed_in($classname)


Invalidates the method cache of any classes dependent on the given class. This is not normally necessary. The only known case where pure perl code can confuse the method cache is when you manually install a new constant subroutine by using a readonly scalar value, like the internals of constant do. If you find another case, please report it so we can either fix it or document the exception here.

mro::get_pkg_gen($classname)


Returns an integer which is incremented every time a real local method in the package

$classname
changes, or the local
@ISA
of
$classname
is modified.

This is intended for authors of modules which do lots of class introspection, as it allows them to very quickly check if anything important about the local properties of a given class have changed since the last time they looked. It does not increment on method/

@ISA
changes in superclasses.

It’s still up to you to seek out the actual changes, and there might not actually be any. Perhaps all of the changes since you last checked cancelled each other out and left the package in the state it was in before.

This integer normally starts off at a value of

1
when a package stash is instantiated. Calling it on packages whose stashes do not exist at all will return
0
. If a package stash is completely deleted (not a normal occurence, but it can happen if someone does something like
undef %PkgName::
), the number will be reset to either
0
or
1
, depending on how completely package was wiped out.

next::method


This is somewhat like

SUPER
, but it uses the C3 method resolution order to get better consistency in multiple inheritance situations. Note that while inheritance in general follows whichever MRO is in effect for the given class,
next::method
only uses the C3 MRO.

One generally uses it like so:


  sub some_method {
    my $self = shift;
    my $superclass_answer = $self->next::method(@_);
    return $superclass_answer + 1;
  }

Note that you don’t (re-)specify the method name. It forces you to always use the same method name as the method you started in.

It can be called on an object or a class, of course.

The way it resolves which actual method to call is:
1. First, it determines the linearized C3 MRO of the object or class it is being called on.
2. Then, it determines the class and method name of the context it was invoked from.
3. Finally, it searches down the C3 MRO list until it reaches the contextually enclosing class, then searches further down the MRO list for the next method with the same name as the contextually enclosing method.
Failure to find a next method will result in an exception being thrown (see below for alternatives).

This is substantially different than the behavior of

SUPER
under complex multiple inheritance. (This becomes obvious when one realizes that the common superclasses in the C3 linearizations of a given class and one of its parents will not always be ordered the same for both.)

Caveat: Calling

next::method
from methods defined outside the class:

There is an edge case when using

next::method
from within a subroutine which was created in a different module than the one it is called from. It sounds complicated, but it really isn’t. Here is an example which will not work correctly:


  *Foo::foo = sub { (shift)->next::method(@_) };

The problem exists because the anonymous subroutine being assigned to the

*Foo::foo
glob will show up in the call stack as being called
__ANON__
and not
foo
as you might expect. Since
next::method
uses
caller
to find the name of the method it was called in, it will fail in this case.

But fear not, there’s a simple solution. The module

Sub::Name
will reach into the perl internals and assign a name to an anonymous subroutine for you. Simply do this:


  use Sub::Name subname;
  *Foo::foo = subname Foo::foo => sub { (shift)->next::method(@_) };

and things will Just Work.

next::can


This is similar to

next::method
, but just returns either a code reference or
undef
to indicate that no further methods of this name exist.

maybe::next::method


In simple cases, it is equivalent to:


   $self->next::method(@_) if $self->next_can;

But there are some cases where only this solution works (like

goto &maybe::next::method
);

SEE ALSO


The original Dylan paper


<http://www.webcom.com/haahr/dylan/linearization-oopsla96.html>

The prototype Perl 6 Object Model uses C3


<http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/perl5/Perl6-MetaModel/>

Parrot now uses C3


<http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/perl6-internals/2746631>
<http://use.perl.org/~autrijus/journal/25768>

Python 2.3 \s-1MRO\s0 related links


<http://www.python.org/2.3/mro.html>
<http://www.python.org/2.2.2/descrintro.html#mro>

C3 for TinyCLOS


<http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/c3.html>

Class::C3


Class::C3

AUTHOR


Brandon L. Black, <blblack@gmail.com>

Based on Stevan Little’s Class::C3

openSUSE Logo

Contents